The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not meet the criteria for WP:POLITICIAN. It's unclear what would make him notable as an environmentalist, entrepreneur or author either. His own website, as listed, appear defunct. West Eddy ( talk) 11:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment I have struck Pdacortex's additional !votes for clarity. - RunningOnBrains( talk) 16:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Moreover WP:OUTCOMES#People is clear: Elected and appointed political figures at the national level are generally regarded as notable, as are usually those at the major sub-national level (US state, Canadian province, Japanese prefecture, etc.) Political leaders are given special consideration WP policies because they do influence public opinion. Even the from the small parties. After all, all political parties start small, and their early history, which is comprised of their early leaders, is important to document. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdacortex ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply
That's an interesting opinion West Eddy. A a bit disingenuous, but interesting.
McGowan is notable precisely because he was a Green Party leader. Therefore most of the press on him will be because of his involvement in, and the actions he took on behalf of in the Green Party. It seems to me that you want to remove the page for the very reasons that make him notable.
Additional points in favour of keeping the page are:
Isn't it time for you to stop your over aggressive "editing" and helped to make the page better? Pdacortex ( talk) 11:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC) reply