The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. While the UK does have a narrow "elite" selection of cities whose mayors are directly elected to the position by the voters, Plymouth is not one of them — "Lord Mayor of Plymouth" is simply a ceremonial position that rotates annually among the city councillors rather than being directly elected or having any executive power in its own right. Such mayors are not presumed notable just because they exist, however, so to qualify for an article he would have to be referenced much better than just one local media hit and one primary source. He would need to show nationalizing coverage demonstrating a reason why he was significantly more notable than the norm for this level of office — but nothing here demonstrates that at all.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Virtually no mayors are default notable. Those who are just city councilors given fancy titles need to pass notability for city councilors, and Foster does not do that.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
03:32, 30 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.