From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Keith Linnecor (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find no evidence of WP:NOTABILITY. Local councillor, doesn't seem to meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 07:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van( எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Evano1van( எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: I can find nothing beyond routine local coverage as a backbench councillor ( [1]). Fails WP:POLITICIAN. AllyD ( talk) 08:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. Finnegas ( talk) 23:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- the consensus is that local councillors, even portfolio holders, are NN. I would expect the leader of the council in Birmingham to be notable, but no one else. Peterkingiron ( talk) 20:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.