- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A Train talk 07:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Kathy Joseph ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of broad notability; third-party sources are either very local or are brief mentions. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable winemaker. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 11:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep She is notable female california winemaker - from refs in article + cursory BEFORE. Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup. Promotional material should be cut out via editing - if need be the article could be stubbed down (retaining a short summary, the infobox, etc). Lalalalllla7 ( talk) 11:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- It is rather odd that you straight-up lifted
Icewhiz's rationale from
here.
Lepricavark (
talk)
20:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Can I get a royalty?I also do not think this rationale applies here as this is not fulll of PROMO. Icewhiz ( talk) 20:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Struck lest I get accused of LEGALing for a stmt made in jest. Cut AfD newbies some slack - commentator is article creator and has made contribution to a few woman winemaker articles. Icewhiz ( talk) 20:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- It is rather odd that you straight-up lifted
Icewhiz's rationale from
here.
Lepricavark (
talk)
20:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- keep although something could be said for merging this into the article on the winery; there doesn't seem to be any much independent notability. Mangoe ( talk) 14:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Groundbreaking in terms of gender, cultivars, and movie portrayal - beyond the California coverage she has quite a few google book hits with a bio. Icewhiz ( talk) 20:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep -- I've reviewed the sources and they are borderline for GNG, some being interviews. However, there's some editorial content that precedes the interview, so passable. Not strong, but female winemakers are rare, hence the interest in her career. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.