From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Kate Hollern (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not WP:NOTABLE political candidate, see WP:POLITICIAN - Govindaharihari ( talk) 18:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Meets notability criteria at WP:POLITICIAN as major local political figure. (1) She has led a local authority for the majority of the last 11 years and has garnered significant press attention as a consequence (e.g. 40 mentions on BBC News website). (2) Candidacy for national office does not confer notability BUT her status is also borne out by selection as Labour's candidate for that particular seat: Blackburn. She is virtually guaranteed to be a member of parliament in less than a month(!) Lilywhites74 ( talk) 19:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 00:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Going to remain a short article for a while, but subject is notable. Noteswork ( talk) 09:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Currently fails all notability criteria including WP:POLITICIAN. I agree the subject will meet the criteria if elected to the HoC but has not got there yet. - Galloglass 15:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.