The result was SPEEDY KEEP. A bad faith renomination by a possible sock puppet account with trollish tendencies. Jehochman Talk 17:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi yes. The closer of the first AFD kindly invited anyone that disagreed with the "no consensus" close to raise this issue again. Therefore I am raising it. The main issue on which we should concentrate, that needs consensus, is whether Garvey has received significant coverage in the sources cited, or just mere trivial or passing mention. Let's not worry too much about BLP1E or whether she's Jimmy's wife, but just lets concentrate on the one unresolved issue at bar. I say that the sources are mere "passing mention" type coverage, rather than significant coverage. Therefore, the article fails WP:GNG. Ann Bardrach ( talk) 20:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply