The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A relative of the subject wrote to Wikimedia on behalf of the subject asking that this article be deleted for personal reasons.
S Philbrick(Talk) 18:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Strictly speaking, a person's desire to not have a Wikipedia article doesn't override Wikipedia's right to keep the article, if the person has a strong enough notability claim that an article could be deemed "necessary". But in this case, I'm not really seeing a notability claim like that — I'm seeing a notability claim that would be enough if the article were sourced better than this, but neither the claims nor the sourcing present here as written are compelling enough to overrule the request.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - I see nothing in this article that proves notability, and most of it is simply quotations from sourced articles. A quick search on Google didn't really come up with much in the way of options to help improve the article, either. -
NsTaGaTr(
Talk) 14:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment why is Wikipedia taking requests from relatives? That leaves the door open for deletions as a result of family feuds. A direct request from the subject should likely be the ony one honoured.
96.127.242.251 (
talk) 02:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.