- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK#2, bad faith nomination by a sockpuppet. ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 07:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Julio Sadorra
Julio Sadorra – ( View log · Stats)
Primefac deleted the above page and recreated the page ,which was closed by bad NAC.But some other again closed the discussion with bad faith,so i am recreated the page Polammagudi ( talk) 03:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC) ( Polammagudi ( talk) 03:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC))
Wiki-Coffee vote in invalid
• 17:12, 4 February 2017 Primefac (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Sadorra (2nd nomination) (Duplicate nomination created due to some confusion thanks to a bad NAC close)
Primefac deleted the above page and recreated the discussion page (which was closed by bad NAC).But some other user Favonian again closed the discussion with bad faith. Really Favonian supports CatcherStorm (who is the article creator)?
He is behave like sock and try to save CatcherStorm articles /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Julio_Sadorra /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S._Dallas_Dance_(2nd_nomination) https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Julio_Sadorra&diff=763684305&oldid=763652690 /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Christaphercharly https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S._Dallas_Dance_(2nd_nomination)&diff=763649061&oldid=763638114
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 5. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 03:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.