The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I see enough coverage to justify keeping the article. An additional factor is that the article indirectly sheds light on
Dorothy Day, a very notable figure, but with information that would be clutter in the Day bio.
JamesMLanetc 04:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 20:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The subject of the article passes GNG.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 00:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. More than enough sources justifying GNG.--
Ipigott (
talk) 08:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep there are a lot of non-independent sources which probably need to be trimmed, but the first three sources look solid enough for me.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 09:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - clearly the subject of this article is notable as a writer, permaculturalist and educator.
Netherzone (
talk) 02:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.