- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wily D 09:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Jon Girodes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Primary candidate; does not appear to meet notability guideline at WP:POLITICIAN. Kinu t/ c 23:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:POLITICIAN, other aspects do not meet WP:GNG-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- If deleted, also removed Jon Girodes (candidate), a redirect to the main article-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Easily fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. It could be WP:TOOSOON if he were to get elected but Republicans generally don't get elected where he lives. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 02:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- As usual, WP:NPOL dictates that unelected candidates do not qualify for articles on Wikipedia just for being candidates; if they haven't already established enough notability for other things that they already qualified for a Wikipedia article before they became candidates, then they have to win the election, not just run in it, to become notable enough. I swear to gawd I'm going to make this into a template so I don't have to keep typing it out every time a campaign manager posts their boss's campaign brochure. No prejudice against recreation in November if he wins, but right now it's a big fat delete. Note also that this version is basically an exact copy of the article that was posted a few days ago at Jon Girodes (Politician) by User:Jon Girodes himself, and was speedied A7 within minutes — so in addition to all the other things wrong with this, add conflict of interest to the pot too. Bearcat ( talk) 05:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.