This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 February 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. While the article urgently requires cleanup, original research is not in itself a reason for deletion. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply
This article contains unencyclopedic entries, so this thing should be deleted, don't you agree? Enco1984 ( talk) 14:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC) reply