The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kevin (
talk) 08:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Found one
source which is unreliable and trivial. With that being said and no other reliable information to work off this should be deleted. -Marcusmax(
speak) 03:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete No references sufficient to establish notability.
Jim Heaphy (
talk) 04:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.