- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Looks like we don't have good enough evidence of notability here. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- John J. Tormey III ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable lawyer lacking independent, non-trivial, in-depth support. References are quotes or single line mentions. Fails WP:N. reddogsix ( talk) 16:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable lawyer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Retain - The lawyer (JJT III) is not particularly notable but occasionally shows up in news and other searches. An entry would disambiguate from JJT jr, (the father of JJT III), who is a noted actor and dancer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.208.57.82 ( talk) 15:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - This is not a reason retain the article. It still lacks notability. reddogsix ( talk) 16:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - The person seems to be more notable than Anita C. Hill (The minister/realtor). Who not only has a wiki page, but is used as an example for disambiguating pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.208.57.82 ( talk) 14:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment -
Far from it. It appears you do not understand Wikipedia based notability.Sorry I thought you were referring to Anita Hill. Regardless, the article you are referring to has no bearing on this AfD. It is possible that article should be nominated for deletion as well, feel free to do so if you are believe this to be the case. reddogsix ( talk) 14:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment -
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication of notability. The argument seems to be, he's a lawyer, and he's had some cases where his name gets mentioned in a news paper, as happens with pretty much every litigator. Plus, his dad was an actor/dancer. But none of this adds up to notability. TJRC ( talk) 01:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.