The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. A good haircut could turn this into a worthy encyclopedic article. If he is non-notable then there are countless thousands of current similar bio entries in Wiki that need the axe as well. One man's meat......
Moriori09:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep - I've scraped this article with a NPOV comb, and would argue that while some more citations are needed, notability is asserted in spades. He was
William, after all!
Colonel Tom14:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep and clean up. Vanity is not a basis for deletion. Edit out anything unverifiable, POV, or based on original research, and keep the rest, in accordance with the actual policies and principles on which Wikipedia is founded. —
HaelethTalk
Keep I've "cleaned it up" by removing items that might be deemed controversial. Any so considered can be found in my website, which I have just updated with archival footage from British Pathe. Please don't delete all of this entry, I think it belongs here in Wilkipedia.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.