The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call meHahc21 07:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
WP:BLP of a writer whose notability appears exclusively local, relying almost entirely on
primary sources with precious little
reliable source coverage to actually get him over
WP:WRITER. No prejudice against recreation in the future if his basic notability and/or the availability of real sourcing actually improves, but this version (which has been tagged for notability since 2010 with no discernible improvement) needs to be deleted.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable and unsuccessful candidate for local office who also lacks notability from his musical/writing career. Half the sources are broken and the rest are, as Bearcat noted, primary sources. The only others I can find are self-published. He thus fails
WP:POLITICIAN,
WP:WRITER,
WP:PERFORMER and the
WP:GNG.
Tiller54 (
talk) 17:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:17, 24 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Getting a few hundred votes in an election is not enough to make him a notable politician and there's a lot of sources to meet the GNG.
131.118.229.17 (
talk) 01:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.