The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 01:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Joey Cavaccini (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently self created article; does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG; a WP:BEFORE search finds local coverage including current candidature for county level representation, which again, does not meet WP:NPOL Melcous ( talk) 01:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom, agreed on failing to meet NPOL. creffett ( talk) 01:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 04:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 04:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 04:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 04:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable for the purposes of entitling him to have a Wikipedia article, but the sourcing is not getting him over WP:GNG — it consists entirely of primary source content on the self-published websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with, and there's no evidence of reliable source coverage about him in real media being shown. And Melcous is also correct that the reliable source coverage that does show up in a Google search is related entirely to his as yet non-winning candidacy in a county-level election, which is not the kind of coverage that changes the equation as being a candidate in a local election does not clear our notability standards either. Bearcat ( talk) 15:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete -- Quite apart from COI issues, he is clearly a NN local historian. Most local politicians are NN, even if they were elected. Peterkingiron ( talk) 18:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete I saw one source of note but overall this is just promotion and puffery based on local coverage. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 02:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.