- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain ( talk) 00:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Joanna Thomas
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joanna Thomas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No decent references. Lots of links to promotional material. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete an overly promotional article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 23:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting one to illicit more participation by reviewers. Promotional material is not a reason to delete. The subject could be significant if time is spent into looking at coverage. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Relisting one to illicit more participation by reviewers. Promotional material is not a reason to delete. The subject could be significant if time is spent into looking at coverage. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Page content seem too personally detailed hence Possible WP:COI plus Nine references were from the subjects website, one from facebook hence fails WP:GOODREFS Delibolt ( talk) 19:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.