The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The nomination, like the prod, provides no specifics about the subject – it's just a bland, generic cut/paste. When one actually searches for information, it's easy to find sources about this iconic character. Our policy
WP:ATD therefore applies, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page."
Andrew🐉(
talk)
09:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The first source contains one sentence of analysis about his homophobia. Interesting, but not
WP:SIGCOV. Second story doesn't go beyond a plot summary. As for the last source, it's a plot summary again and I don't see how it is reliable (some old style website created by unknown party about "famous detectives")? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here00:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge/redirect Whether or not the character himself is notable,
Taggart is not a long article and could have expansion on the plot/storyline of the series, and per
WP:NOPAGE a separate article is not warranted.
Reywas92Talk20:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Merge/redirect to the Taggart article. Articles about characters are typically only appropriate if the character is widely discussed in their own right, which usually only happens if they appear in multiple different works (spinoffs, novelizations, etc.). --
RL0919 (
talk)
19:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.