The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim Motznik (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as a city councillor in a city not large enough to confer notability on its city councillors under WP:POLITICIAN. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete what little coverage there is, is not significant, fails WP:GNG, also fails WP:Politician as purely local city councilor. Coverage like "Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and City Councilman Jim Motznik today introduced legislation that will eliminate roadblocks that prevent active-duty military personnel from being hired or promoted within the City." Pittsburgh city news release 23/09/2008. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Members of Pittsburgh city council do not pass notability guidelines for politicians. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.