The result was no consensus. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 16:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsuccessful candidate for political office, with no strong claim of notability per WP:POLITICIAN otherwise. Note that in the prior discussion, even two of the four keeps were followed by "at least temporarily", and a third one still used the proximity of the election as its primary rationale for keeping — which means there wasn't even really a particularly strong consensus behind his notability, with just one person arguing that the mere fact of being a candidate should confer permanent notability. As with many other unsuccessful candidates for office, WP:BLP1E also applies here if he can't credibly be shown to be particularly notable for anything else. This was recently nominated for speedy deletion, further, but I've declined that and am bringing it to AFD because of the prior AFD discussion. Delete unless a credible case can be made that he's notable for more than just running as a candidate for office and losing. Bearcat ( talk) 22:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply