The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that it fails WP:NPOL and, separately, it does not meet. WP:BIO. Just Chilling ( talk) 23:48, 23 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Jill Barto (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School district trustees do not generally meet criteria of WP:NPOL. ... discospinster _talk 23:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Delete After searching on Google and Google news, I found no other reports from reliable sources other than routine press coverage for the school district. Viztor ( talk) 01:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 05:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete. School board trustees are not automatically notable per WP:NPOL just because they exist. In rare circumstances, it might be theoretically possible for a school board trustee to clear the bar, if they can be shown as the subject of an unusual volume and range and depth of reliable source coverage that establishes them as much more notable than most other school board trustees — for example, a trustee in California who was somehow so prominent that she was getting coverage in New York would clearly be notable. But the fact that you can technically reference the trustee's vote totals to a primary source table of election results is not, in and of itself, a notability freebie that exempts her from having to have real media coverage. Bearcat ( talk) 15:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Bearcat. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete.Being in school board does not make her notable with not enough coverage. Alex-h ( talk) 12:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.