From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Jevin Hodge (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLOUTCOMES. The deputy chair of a province/state-level political party is not inherently notable. There is no other claim to notability advanced in the article. Chetsford ( talk) 18:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Edited article to reflect historic significance of election as a party official.--davidmjaf — Preceding unsigned comment added by davidmjaf ( talkcontribs)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 04:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 04:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Being the youngest person (or the youngest African American person) to hold an otherwise non-notable office is not in and of itself an inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to clear our regular notability standards. But being deputy chair of a political party is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass, and the sourcing here isn't strong enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu: it's heavily dependent on primary sources rather than reliable ones, all but one of the reliable ones represent local coverage that would merely be expected to exist, and the only one that's more than local isn't covering him in a noteworthy context. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do much better than this, but if I were to actually strip all the ineligible sources that can't actually be used as support for notability, there wouldn't be enough left to make the article keepable. Bearcat ( talk) 19:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Interesting that he claims (no one else seems to care) things about his being super young, but we never even learn his age. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.