The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Very detailed, but none of it is notable by any reasonable standard. If the GNG alone is enough to justify this, then we need to re-examine the rationale. DGG (
talk ) 04:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete. All the sources are local, as one might expect in a case such as this. I would probably be more conflicted about this article if it hadn't been an autobiography.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 10:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete. Becoming an elected official is not in itself notable. Unless the subject has used that office to actually achieve something that somebody in that position might not reasonably be expected to achieve, then this article is not about anyone notable. --
gilgongo (
talk) 00:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Actually, it is for many positions. We write articles for people before they're even sworn into office, when they've literally accomplished nothing notable besides winning an election. US Representatives, state legislators, and city councilmembers for cities about twice as large as Kansas City are all presumed to be notable. -
LtNOWIS (
talk) 20:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.