- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep = a snowstorm. Le petit fromage ( talk) 03:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Jeremy McMullen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable guy. founds no source about him. Truley non-notable. Beerest 2 Talk page 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Easily passes WP:GNG, with a full obituary in a leading UK newpsaper. Edwardx ( talk) 14:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep In this case, the obituary drew attention to an individual that would have passed WP:GNG, but did not yet have an article on here. I have added a few references to this article as well. Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 15:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Easily passes GNG. The Guardian called him "the leading expert of his generation on employment law" and he is mentioned in 56 articles in The Times according to my search of their archive. I would think there are numerous references to him in The Telegraph and legal publications too, but I haven't checked those yet. Philafrenzy ( talk) 15:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As per Philafrenzy. That's an astonishing number of references in The Times in my opinion, clearly a notable barrister of his time. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 23:13, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - A quick Google Scholar and Google Book search turned up numerous citations not referenced in this article. The subject is notable due to reliable sources already included as references. Clearly meets WP:GNG. - AuthorAuthor ( talk) 03:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination is misconceived. Can we have a Snow Keep please? Philafrenzy ( talk) 08:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. An obit in The Guardian is perfectly sufficient for notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.