The result was keep. Consensus is that the article meets notability requirements. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't seem to meet the general notability guideline because there are not sufficient reliable, third-party sources that focus specifically on the subject. The sources available are generally either LaRouche sources or self-published sites, and the available press coverage focuses mostly on LaRouche and tells us little to nothing about Duggan himself; the article appears to be of the variety described at WP:COATRACK. The bottom line is that we can't write a biography of Duggan because we don't have the appropriate sources to allow us to do that. -- Leatherstocking ( talk) 15:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC) reply
It is an issue that is strongly disliked by the LaRouche movement, for obvious reasons. As for Dennis King, he made three edits to the article in 2007, and is currently used as a source in it once, and only as one source among several to support that the movement has been known for using violence against its opponents; other sources saying this include academics, the Washington Post, and the New York Times, many of them pre-dating King as sources, so he is hardly alone. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 15:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: for those who are commenting on the infobox, please see Template talk:LaRouche movement#RfC: Issues about "People" section. -- Leatherstocking ( talk) 20:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC) reply