The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I'm amazed this article lasted this long, and I used to subscribe to the rationale behind WP:PORNBIO. This would not have passed any version of the PORNBIO since April 2009. It survived the previous AfD mainly through a PORNBIO criterion dropped in 2007. The sources are crap. Biographical information is sourced from IAFD, IMDb and social media. Porn trade press consists of entries in lists of performers, press releases and interviews. No strong claim of passing
WP:BASIC or
WP:ENT.
• Gene93k (
talk)
01:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:ENTERTAINER. (
WP:PORNBIO redirects there.) It puts forth a very reasonable set of guidelines for the question of "who cares about this article?" (Please note that in this case, "Who cares...?" isn't a rhetorical question that would mean "no one cares." Rather, it is a genuine question, significant to an encyclopedia.) This person is very much
run-of-the-mill.
5.78.105.24 (
talk)
08:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete the fact that a sub-standard article like this that meets no reasonable notability criteria has existed on Wikipedia for well over a decade gives the project a major black eye. While not quite true any more, it is articles like this that lead to the lament of October 2012, which is that Wikipedia had more articles on pornographic film actresses than on women poets or women journalists, or women lawyers. While some of the lament of October 2012 focuses on issues beyond Wikipedia, having this article is clearly a sign of a problem on Wikipedia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
04:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Dear friend, if Wikipedia had more articles on pornographic film actresses than on women poets or women journalists, or women lawyers, or women biologists, and so on, the problem would rely not in the quality of articles about adult actresses, but in the fact that articles about women poets, or women journalists are too few...
Westmanurbe (
talk)
22:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.