From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jennifer Lawrence#Filmography. Note that this means the FLC needs to be archived. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 03:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Jennifer Lawrence filmography

Jennifer Lawrence filmography (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A well-intentioned but premature content fork. The tables here took up less than 5% of her main bio's article space and their content is already covered there. No prejudice against recreation in the future when she's done more work, but it's simply too soon for this to have a standalone article. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to the main article now. Can be a standalone list in the next 2-3 years. Krimuk|90 ( talk) 06:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per nom Krimuk90. Vensatry (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per above. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect: Give it another few years and I believe we could have this filmography page again. DARTHBOTTO  talkcont 04:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect (speedy!) – As a primarily "film" actress without significant TV credits, a standalone "Filmography" article is not warranted here. -- IJBall ( contribstalk) 13:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Replace and redirect Filmography page is better sourced than the one on the main article, so it should replace the main article's filmography section. Agree with spinning it off when it gets big enough (consider WP:SIZESPLIT) AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 19:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.