The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanztalk 02:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Subject is notable in the area of transgender per the hundreds of news items written on the subject and the Google Books and Google Scholar items associated with the subject.
User:Abbottonian seems to have a personal issue with recognizing transgender people since he refers to Jen Richards's website as "his website". I suggest that
User:Abbottonian recuse himself from this debate if he has a personal issue with transgender people. —
goethean 12:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Goethean: I have no interest or conflict with transgender, just made a gender mistake while generating AfD. Where page is concerned, his/her website might be notable to have Wikipedia page but Jen Richards do not have independent notability. Being a website founder, and creator of non-notable (
Her Story (web series)) is not enough.
Abbottonian (
talk) 13:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)User:Abbottonian has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.reply
Delete He is not a notable individual. Being a minor supporting cast member in a reality television show does not make him notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Johnpacklambert, those are not the correct pronouns: Jen Richards is a transgender woman so we need to use female pronouns when discussing her. I know this may seem nitpicky, but all AfD discussions are open to the world and we should, as Wikipedia editors strive to be inclusive.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 23:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep As
goethean said. She is notable in the trans community, has production credits to her name, and there are plenty of resources to back this up. I also suggest that anyone who is predisposed against transgender persons (as might be indicated by misgendering) remove themselves from the discussion. This kind of behavior should not be tolerated.
TMagen (
talk) 10:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I am really hoping this is an innocent mistake.
Johnpacklambert, would you please correct your error?
Innisfree987 (
talk) 18:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep In addition to the sources Northamerica1000 mentions, here's
1,
2,
3,
4 more.
Innisfree987 (
talk) 18:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep I also found:
LA Times and that she is often on the TV Show, "I Am Cait."
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 23:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.