The result was no consensus. I have given the arguments be single purpose accounts, which did not make arguments based on the notability guidelines very little weight. This leads me to close this as no consensus, as there is still disagreement over whether it meets the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 09:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable physician/politician lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. Article not supported by secondary sources. ttonyb ( talk) 03:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply
"Keep" perhaps Dr. Oppenheim needs to site what notable achievements he has done for the medical industry, ie articles,lectures.... As a Neurosurgeon in the North East, he is quite notable. Google should not be "the end all be all" to decide if a person is notable. Sorry Google. Vschwaid ( talk) 22:54, 3 January 2011 (UTC)— Vschwaid ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Weak keep - as a politican, he is laughably non-notable, but reviewing the publications by him as a physician, he might be so. Bearian ( talk) 16:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC) reply