The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The cited sources are almost exclusively about some other topic, with this person mentioned in passing. Seems to me he's just another programmer, and does not meet
WP:N.
Orange Mike |
Talk18:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm not going to !vote this either way, since I don't have a strong opinion and don't really care. What I will say, is as a procedural matter, I don't think it was a good idea to renominate this article so soon after it was closed as no consensus. I think it would have been better to leave it for a while, to allow people to mull on the topic a bit more, etc, rather than rushing in to another nomination.
SJK (
talk)
09:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
reply to Comment""" - I did not notice when I made the nomination that it had recently been up for an AfD. It tripped some trigger or other and seemed to me to be an obvious candidacy for AfD. --
Orange Mike |
Talk22:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Easy call. The first two sources I tried, The Daily Nexus and the WSJ, were all I needed. He's notable. The
WP:RS discussing the subject exist.
Msnicki (
talk)
03:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.