From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No predjudice against speedy-renomination. ( non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 12:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Jay Clough (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is incredibly non-neutral and promotional, as well as the subject is only "notable" for 1 event. Grammarxxx ( What'd I do this time?) 01:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Washington, 2010. This is an appropriate outcome for losing candidates for national office WP:POLOUTCOMES. -- Enos733 ( talk) 16:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and Rewrite. The article needs to have Clough's 2012 election results added in, and information about his term as chair of the Franklin County Democrats and a candidate for Chair of the Washington State Democrats needs to be there, too. In terms of Eastern Washington Democrats Clough is one of the big names, which I realize is a big fish: small pond problem. RyanGrant ( talk) 19:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC ( talk) 20:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.