The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. But article will need a rework for BLP issues, as it's not focused on notability right now. I see quite a bit of independent secondary coverage of the subject's judicial opinions and aspects of their background eg
[1][2][3][4], and much more. —
siroχo01:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to consider
User:BD2412's proposal. Unfortunately, article has not been created yet. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!00:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly fails
WP:GNG, and the additional sources presented don't really cover him - they're all about the state's governor. Non-notable judicial nominee.
SportingFlyerT·C12:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not much feedback on BD2412's proposal so I guess this discussion will have to close based on the response of participants alone. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!01:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Support proposal of BD2412 - that sounds like a good idea to me. I'd be happy to help on that article; if it is created, please let me know on my talk page.
Actualcpscm (
talk)
13:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.