From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 08:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Jaffar khattak (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN. Saqib ( talk) 05:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being "expected" candidates in elections they haven't won yet — our notability standards for politicians require the holding of political office, not mere candidacy for it. But nothing else here demonstrates that he has preexisting notability for any other reason, and the sources are entirely about Siraj Khan's expulsion from the PTI while entirely failing to mention Khattak's name at all. So no prejudice against recreation on or after election day 2018 if he wins the seat, but nothing here qualifies him for an article today. Also, WP:COI as the article was created by User:Khattak adamzai. Bearcat ( talk) 17:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.