- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Jacob Rubinovitz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence this autobiography meets WP:PROF notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. It seems that his books and articles had sufficiently significant impact in the robotics discipline to pass the threshold of WP:ACADEMIC. Marokwitz ( talk) 10:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep - Google scholar search turns up 163 results. Several papers are heavily cited. As Marokwitz wrote, he has had significant impact in robotics. JSFarman ( talk) 21:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.