The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 14:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't meet notability requirements. Just having a column isn't enough. Little in the way of independent references here.
VanEman (
talk) 17:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST
flyer 00:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as the overall article is still questionable and searches found nothing better than a few links.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)reply
That one is useless, being a search for the exact phrase "Jack Schofield (journalist)". My search looks for sources containing the exact phrase "Jack Schofield" and, separately, the word "Guardian".
86.17.222.157 (
talk) 13:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)reply
That's actually pretty smart. Thanks! Sorry for removing it before.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not meet
WP:GNG. We need several, reliable sources, not primary sources like The Guardian. Schofield is not mentioned in other
WP:VG/RS media.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.