From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Jack Schofield (journalist)

Jack Schofield (journalist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Only primary sources from where he wrote (The Guardian)—no secondary sources. Doesn't meet any point of the journalist notability guideline as it is. czar 01:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK  22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK  22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK  22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Doesn't meet notability requirements. Just having a column isn't enough. Little in the way of independent references here. VanEman ( talk) 17:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST flyer 00:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • That one is useless, being a search for the exact phrase "Jack Schofield (journalist)". My search looks for sources containing the exact phrase "Jack Schofield" and, separately, the word "Guardian". 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 13:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.