The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Kept. Citing and sourcing is an issue, but not grounds for deletion.
Hasteur (
talk) 18:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)reply
I didn't know that the policy states that being a member of the national legislature makes a person notable. However, he doesn't have significant coverage. No official website or other source which can contribute to the creation of an article about him. Third party sources are limited to uninformative mentions of his name. His congress profile is only an extensive lists of house resolutions to which he's contributed to.
Moray An Par (
talk) 13:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep passed
WP:POLITICIAN as a member of a national legislature. Hut 8.5 11:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep. Members of national legislatures enjoy presumptive notability; even if there are insufficient sources to expand an article beyond a stubby stub, these positions and their holders are traditionally encyclopedic.
Serpent's Choice (
talk) 16:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep as there is a strong presumption that reliable sources exist, even if they are in Tagalog or another Filipino language, or if they are not readily available online. Meets
WP:POLITICIAN.
Cullen328 (
talk) 19:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep- Member of national legislature is the primary clause of
WP:POLITICIAN, and already sourced to the government site.
Dru of Id (
talk) 19:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.