The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Almost the whole thing is cited to himself, except for one puffy review of his restaurant which I suppose establishes that he's technically a restaurateur, but certainly not that he's a notable one.
199.247.43.170 (
talk)
08:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Lots of puffery. Ostensibly has plenty of refs - but when actually checking them they end up being non-reliable and/or not mentioning our subject. Not much in my
WP:BEFORE in English.
Icewhiz (
talk)
13:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Article is entirely promotional, without an acceptable source to be found in the references or in an online search. The article is vacuous enough that it probably would have been a slam dunk g11.
SWL36 (
talk)
19:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)reply
While there have been prestigious Fellows of the RSA, fellowship per se is not particularly selective or prestigious, and is essentially open to anyone who files an application and coughs up a monthly fee of £14.83. As the
organisation's FAQ says, "How likely is it that my application will be accepted? Our ethos is inclusive and we value all who positively impact society. Providing there is demonstrable evidence from either your professional or civic life that you share the values outlined in the Fellowship Charter we will be pleased to welcome you into the Fellowship."
Abecedare (
talk)
20:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Totally NN. A Bangladeshi army officer, who opened a UK restaurant. The material on his charitable works is cited from the subject's own blog: not a reliable source.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.