- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 02:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Illinois Fair Tax ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be created by two non-notable lobbyists pushing for one piece of legislation that never got a committee hearing and has since disbanded. No real evidence of notability. DeleteAllTheThings ( talk) 14:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, it may need to be rewritten but it is clearly notable. GregJackP Boomer! 00:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 13:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 13:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 01:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 01:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Articles in the Chicago Tribune, Sun Times and on NPR give an indication of notability, and this coverage is over time, not just one event. Nwlaw63 ( talk) 14:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per GregJackP and Nwlaw63. Proposals for legislation do not require a committee hearing to be notable, they require significant coverage. James500 ( talk) 10:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.