The result was speedy delete. PhilKnight ( talk) 20:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Neologism, per WP:DEL#REASON. The few sites that mention this term are mostly Wikipedia mirrors, or blog posts by authors of the article. [1] The article should be deleted and any usable material it contains should be merged into the relevant articles. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 20:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Seems like it needs a new home. Any ideas for a new name? Large-scale hydraulic engineering? Hydraulic engineering (large scale)? Andrewjlockley ( talk) 22:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC) reply
We need a new page, to be called Geoengineering_projects, with an overview of all geoengineering projects. Projects should be sortable by type (which could include hydraulic). Until we have such an overview, I suggest we leave this page as is. -- Sam.carana ( talk) 01:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Atmoz, are you saying that the new article should be removed as well? I think that large-scale hydraulic engineering projects should probably be changed to proposed large-scale hydraulic engineering projects, but it seems like a valid category to me to list off these projects. Awickert ( talk) 19:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I got pissed off with AJL pratting around moving the thing that was destined to die and losing the talk pages, so I've deleted it William M. Connolley ( talk) 19:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply