- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurricanehink ( talk • contribs)
Hurricane Beryl
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hurricane Beryl ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Category 1 hurricane, failed to even affect land as a tropical system. Fails
WP:NOTNEWS. Content can be accommodated easily at
2018 Atlantic hurricane season#Hurricane Beryl.
Buttons0603 (
talk)
18:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - wasn't aware that a merge discussion would be more appropriate, apologies.
Buttons0603 (
talk)
19:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Several things wrong here. This is not how you request this (it could be a redirect) and second the article is too large now to fit in the 2018 AHS page. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 19:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – Doesn't fail NOTNEWS, sufficient news sources in multiple languages covering the event. Impact on land is applicable to the overall storm regardless of whether or not it was a tropical cyclone at the time. AfD is inappropriate for this situation; a merge discussion on the talk page is how this should be handled. ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 19:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – I echo the sentiments that Cyclonebiskit noted earlier. A tropical cyclone need not remain a tropical cyclone to be newsworthy, particularly when impacting land. From what I see, there is fairly clear, reliable, and verifiable coverage of Beryl's effects in the Caribbean, regardless if they were remnants of the storm. TheAustinMan( Talk· Works) 19:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose – My statements echo those of Cyclonebiskit and TheAustinMan, wherein a tropical cyclone itself does not need to be a tropical cyclone to be noteworthy. Beryl was in addition a very unusual tropical cyclone, developing in the Main Development Region within the otherwise unfavorable month of July, as well as regenerating over the Gulf Stream as a subtropical cyclone. I see nothing here to remove. Cooper 19:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.