- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hugh Moran ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for political office. While there was once a time when unsuccessful candidates in leadership conventions were accepted as notable on the grounds that they added valuable context to the convention coverage, that's no longer accepted as a claim of notability in its own right if you can't get him over any other inclusion criterion besides that fact alone — but with just two sources here which are both about the convention, there's nothing else here that would earn him an article. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 03:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete being a failed candidate at this level does not make someone notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 07:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as he's not solidly satisfying the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as article appears to be more of an advertisement that anything else. The dude is notable for losing elections, that I did notice. -- ♥Golf ( talk) 00:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.