The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Views to retain the page carry more weight than those to delete or redirect, not to mention being more numerous.
Owen×☎20:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - as I pointed out last time, there are in-depth articles about the show, in national media coverage from the turn of the century.
National Post ... actually the earlier more complete version of the article on the front page of the
Montreal Gazette would be the better reference.
Nfitz (
talk)
22:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)reply
First article (National Post) is a hype piece centered on the 2 broadcasters that guest starred in an episode. It is not a review or indepth coverage of the show itself. Second article is just the same article, but more complete (as you stated). I don't think either support notability for the show. The article might be useful in the pages for the 2 broadcasters, but I feel it does nothing for an article on the show.
DonaldD23talk to me00:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
And the article also contains four other footnotes, from the Waterloo Record and the Ottawa Citizen and Maclean's, which you seem to be either overlooking or deliberately pretending they aren't there.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment....I concur with Donaldd23 and share his concern....six footnotes, yes, some from reliable media...but none of them seems to be focusing on the series except one (and only to mention it broadcast in Spain, which is significant but is it enough?)! One (Ottawa Citizen) is even an article from ...September 1998 (when the series premiered in October 1999....). (The article in The Record Kitchener is also dated from one month before 1st broadcast....) The Gulf News article just mentions the name of the series....And this cruel lack of content clearly shows in the article itself. And if the page cannot be expanded, a redirect is a better outcome....since when is the number of footnotes considered enough?-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)20:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.