The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Enigmamsg 17:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Article has gone uncited for about 5 years now. The article creator (Rafaelosornio) claims to be a psychologist and the original article (c. 2013) quotes a "Rafael Medina." It appeared to be OR at the time. The current state of the article states, "fetishizing the experience or a related experience, such as submission or humiliation." Submission and/or humiliation is not exclusive to homosexuality (
BDSM). Next the term "homosexual fetishism." In reviewing some academic literature, the term is referred to with regards to leather, foot, or other types of sexual play that is not exclusive to homosexuality. I think this article needs to be deleted, without discrimination for a better referenced/defined article in the future.
Classicwiki (
talk) If you reply here, please
ping me. 21:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing of value in the current version or elsewhere in the page history.
XOR'easter (
talk) 22:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing notable at all, also possibly a hoaxy dictionary definition?
SportingFlyertalk 23:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Five years and there is even less here than the original unsourced stub that should not have been accepted. We can always create a proper article on this if needed and properly sourced. I find it interesting that a new editor appears, claims to be a psychologist with their first edit, spends 3 days editing exclusively sexual topics (transvestism, homosexuality, fetishism, and pedophilia), and then five years editing exclusively religious topics.
Meters (
talk) 04:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Totally ambiguous title, dict def.
Beyond My Ken (
talk) 18:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as a rather ridiculous article that offers no content value to the project.
Chetsford (
talk) 02:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.