The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 07:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The subject has no coverage I can find in
reliable sources. No news articles in English. Unless there is significant coverage in foreign language press being First Secretary in a foreign Mission is not sufficient for the subject to have inherent notability per
WP:POL. The only reference in the article is his bio page from the Afghan Mission in India. This is obviously not an independent third party source. He fails
general notability guidelines. There are no sources to
verify even the information on the page.
JBH (
talk) 04:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
User:\\'arrior 786 removed above comment as well as the 'REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD' template
[1].
JBH (
talk) 12:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Just another non-notable junior mission functionary four levels below "ambassador" rank.
Pax 05:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete none of his roles carry inherent notability. The disruptive behavior of article creator indicates a strong conflict of interest.
LibStar (
talk) 07:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Too junior for inherent notability. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 14:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)reply
there's no inherent notability for ambassadors in any case.
LibStar (
talk) 12:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
He isn't an ambassador. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.