The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Although if someone can verify this is a real place (a subdivision, most likely) a redirect might be in order, to a city or county article.
W.marsh21:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment. It is neither a census-defined location nor an acceptable mailing address (at least, no results on census.gov and usps.com). On the other hand it does seem to be "defined" as an accessory to the Morgan Hills sewerage district among other things. Results in Google News Archive are largely incidental, though. Primarily it just seems to be a subdivision that has resisted annexation. --
Dhartung |
Talk00:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.