From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's general agreement that the coverage here is borderline: given that, the argument that an exclusive reliance on local news coverage implies a lack of notability, is persuasive. Will draftify per request. Vanamonde ( Talk) 07:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hobson Snead

Hobson Snead (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only source is his fraternity(?). Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Reasonable minds can differ. Yes, it can be argued that this "barely passes GNG". And a similar case can be made for tens of thousands of run-of-the-mill high-school and junior-college coaches. IMO "barely passes GNG" isn't a good enough reason to create and maintain stand-alone articles on JC/HS coaches. Cbl62 ( talk) 20:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: The extra sources are helpful, but ultimately his most notable claim is coaching a now-NAIA program, and most NAIA coaches are not notable. His coverage is limited to a small-town newspaper. Perhaps a redirect to Bluefield as an ATD is possible as well, but I cannot in good faith vote to keep this. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 13:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Etzedek24 Rlendog, note that the claim "most NAIA coaches are not notable" is false if we're talking about head football coaches; see Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Coach Navboxes/NAIA. Jweiss11 ( talk) 20:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Having navboxes doesn't guarantee that all those coaches would stand up to deletion scrutiny. In this case, whether or not I'm going against WPCFB consensus (to be fair, I do not edit much college football content), by mentioning his NAIA coaching status, I follow @ Cbl62's reasoning here. We are running into WP:MILL here. Naturally his local paper will have coverage, but the coverage is just not adequate for a standalone article. I tend to fall on the inclusionist side of things, but I cannot in good faith see a reason to have a standalone article on this guy, especially when you take away his Sig Ep sources for not being independent. The paper coverage just doesn't cut it. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 22:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Etzedek24, the point is not that the navboxes exists. The point is that hundreds of such articles exist—and I supplied that project page with all the navboxes, because the articles are all linked there. Many of them have been challenged for notability and have passed. Many others are clearly notable in their current state. The claim about most NAIA head football coaches not being notability is false. That's my point—irrespective of Snead's of notability. Jweiss11 ( talk) 23:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I see this as passing WP:GNG from the sources. Arguemnts like "It's an NAIA program today" should have no affect because the NAIA wasn't even formed until 18 years after his term at Bluefield. This puts it in the NCAA, which had no divisions until 1956. Note also the NFL was formed in 1920 and was in its infancy. This team was performing at the highest level of the sport and he was a head coach. I'm not shocked that online sources haven't caught up.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 20:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Bluefield was still a junior college during his tenure, so it was likely not an NCAA-affiliated school. The 1925 team's schedule appears to have been other junior colleges, Virginia Tech's freshman football team, and a private military boarding school. GPL93 ( talk) 20:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Striking my position--this is getting interesting, the article Bluefield University (which is linked from the Hobson Snead artilce) says it begain in 1922, but Snead was coaching before then... there are multiple issues here that seem to be in conflict and validation is necessary. I think we need to at least userfy this one and possibly others until we can confirm what was really going on here--and that's before we do any assessment of notability.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Paulmcdonald: Snead graduated from the University of Richmond in 1923 and began coaching that year at Bluefield. Jweiss11 ( talk) 22:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The article on Snead says He served as the head football coach at Bluefield College in Bluefield, Virginia from 1923 to 1924. 1923 comes after 1922. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 22:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Delete per Cbl62. Simply no claim to fame here. Reywas92 Talk 23:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.