The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Ready PAC. Merge also, if editors want to. Sandstein 21:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NOTNEWS. If need-be should be covered in articles relating to Clinton's presidential campaign. No need for yet another article. PROD tag endorsed by
Bearian and
Muboshgu and removed by creator
AusLondonder (
talk) 08:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Not everything that has mainstream news coverage deserves an article.
WP:NOTNEWS. Anything relevant from this article can be shifted to
Ready PAC. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep because it passes the general notability guideline. Articles about the bus, specifically, or its tours have been published in the Washington Post
[1], ABC News
[2], The Weekly Standard
[3], CBS DC
[4], Mother Jones
[5], New York Daily News
[6], Centre Daily Times
[7], Dallas Voice
[8], etc. These are just articles in which the bus is the primary topic, literally likely hundreds exist where the bus is mentioned. It may be unorthodox, but there really isn't a question that the bus is independently notable here.
Dcpoliticaljunkie (
talk) 03:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Also -- there were multiple Politico Pro articles about it... but my subscription has currently lapsed so I can't pull them. Maybe someone else has?
Dcpoliticaljunkie (
talk) 03:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge and Redirect to
United States presidential election, 2016. I don't deny the topic is notable, but it's notable as a part of something else that's notable, and not really distinct from it. It doesn't look like this article will ever support enough information to justify a solo article, so just merge it with a redirect.
Fieari (
talk) 04:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Sure, I'll grant that this is a notable aspect of a larger topic — but it's not independently notable in its own right as a standalone topic. This just needs a brief subsection of
Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 or
Ready PAC, not a full standalone article as a separate thing. Merge and redirect.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect as best connected to that, unlikely convincing for own article.
SwisterTwistertalk 20:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 12:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not everything in the world needs an article and this bus is one of them!, Could be merged I suppose but personally I think it's better off deleted. –
Davey2010Talk 22:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Merge/Redirect over the article on the
Ready PAC as these bus tours were one of that group's main efforts to promote their brand, and Clinton herself, and is best explained in that context. That other page also could use some work, and more well-sourced content would be a major help.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 22:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Yellow Dingo (
talk) 10:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.