From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ready PAC. Merge also, if editors want to.  Sandstein  21:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hillary Bus (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS. If need-be should be covered in articles relating to Clinton's presidential campaign. No need for yet another article. PROD tag endorsed by Bearian and Muboshgu and removed by creator AusLondonder ( talk) 08:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Not everything that has mainstream news coverage deserves an article. WP:NOTNEWS. Anything relevant from this article can be shifted to Ready PAC. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Yes, I endorsed the proposed deletion as non-controversial. It is only vaguely related to the campaign, and gives undue weight to one type of event. Four of the sources are decent, but the others are social media. If truly needed, merge as suggested. Bearian ( talk) 16:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep because it passes the general notability guideline. Articles about the bus, specifically, or its tours have been published in the Washington Post [1], ABC News [2], The Weekly Standard [3], CBS DC [4], Mother Jones [5], New York Daily News [6], Centre Daily Times [7], Dallas Voice [8], etc. These are just articles in which the bus is the primary topic, literally likely hundreds exist where the bus is mentioned. It may be unorthodox, but there really isn't a question that the bus is independently notable here. Dcpoliticaljunkie ( talk) 03:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Also -- there were multiple Politico Pro articles about it... but my subscription has currently lapsed so I can't pull them. Maybe someone else has? Dcpoliticaljunkie ( talk) 03:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Merge and Redirect to United States presidential election, 2016. I don't deny the topic is notable, but it's notable as a part of something else that's notable, and not really distinct from it. It doesn't look like this article will ever support enough information to justify a solo article, so just merge it with a redirect. Fieari ( talk) 04:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Sure, I'll grant that this is a notable aspect of a larger topic — but it's not independently notable in its own right as a standalone topic. This just needs a brief subsection of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 or Ready PAC, not a full standalone article as a separate thing. Merge and redirect. Bearcat ( talk) 15:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect as best connected to that, unlikely convincing for own article. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 12:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Not everything in the world needs an article and this bus is one of them!, Could be merged I suppose but personally I think it's better off deleted. – Davey2010 Talk 22:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Merge/Redirect over the article on the Ready PAC as these bus tours were one of that group's main efforts to promote their brand, and Clinton herself, and is best explained in that context. That other page also could use some work, and more well-sourced content would be a major help. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 22:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo ( talk) 10:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.