From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 15:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hildy Kuryk (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not entirely sure this person is really notable except as a political donor who married an Obama staffer. Editor creating this article has one edit here (to create) and about 20-25 edits on the BLP for her husband Jarrod Bernstein. Suspicion of potential conflict of interest. ColonelHenry ( talk) 03:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 13:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 13:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • delete. The press coverage mentioned above merely mentions her career moves. No evidence of any notable achievements. 05:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. I initially had my doubts, but after looking at the Politico article of Kuryk’s fundraising accomplishment of shattering political fundraising records at a national level, it would be safe to say that she’s notable. Serving as the communications director and Anna Wintour’s right hand person for an institution like Vogue is perhaps not as notable, but still a position of prominence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irvingnet64 ( talkcontribs) 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.