- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hikashop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfererenced article about non-notable software. MER-C 12:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. In its current state, the article probably qualifies for speedy deletion because it does not make any claim of notability. Looking for references, I find some news articles mentioning the company, but nothing that I think rises to the level of significant reliable independent coverage. Deli nk ( talk) 12:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence anywhere of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (However, Deli nk, the article does not qualify for speedy deletion because it does not make any claim of significance, because that speedy deletion criterion applies only to articles about people, animals, organisations, web content, and events, not software.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.