From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Herma Marksman

Herma Marksman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC as a historian. Her relationship with Hugo Chavez is not a reason for a standalone article, per WP:INVALIDBIO. A sentence or two covering her in the "Personal life" section of his article are more than enough. Mooonswimmer 13:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Redirect to Hugo Chávez following a source search on Google Books from which I conclude the mentions are not significant. BrigadierG ( talk) 14:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep My searches found
  1. a 2003 Interview on Foreign Correspondent: https://web.archive.org/web/20060526160431/http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/stories/s882059.htm
  2. 34 mentions (in Spanish) at https://archive.org/details/hugochvezsinunif0000marc?q=%22Herma+Marksman%22
  3. 22 mentioned (in Spanish) at https://archive.org/details/losbrujosdechave0000plac/page/n7/mode/2up?q=%22Herma+Marksman%22
  4. 7 mentions (in Spanish) at https://archive.org/details/elpoderydelirio0000krau/page/150/mode/2up?q=%22Herma+Marksman%22
  5. A whole bunch more similar to the above three at https://archive.org/search?query=%22Herma+Marksman%22&sin=TXT
In summary, I think there are lots of sources about her, but they tend to be books, tend to be in Spanish and therefore not as easy to find if we default towards English-language news. The above is enough to convince me that she passes WP:GNG CT55555( talk) 22:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.